By WasteSignal · England, Scotland and Wales
On this page
Check a waste supplier before using the proposed arrangement, then review it at intervals suited to the waste and the service. Bring the review forward when something changes or you have a reason to question how the waste is being handled. A diary reminder helps with routine reviews, but a concern about tomorrow’s collection needs attention before tomorrow’s collection.
There is no single annual supplier review interval that makes every business compliant across Great Britain. The applicable duty of care, the circumstances of your waste and what you learn about the arrangement determine the steps you need to take. Any monthly, quarterly or annual timetable your business adopts should be described as its own policy.
The monitoring and supplier management guide explains how ongoing reviews fit into a working supplier relationship. For the information to examine at each review, use the waste supplier monitoring checklist.
Does the law say how often to check a waste supplier?
The England and Wales duty of care code requires reasonable steps to protect waste throughout its journey. Its guidance includes checking the next holder and intended destination, with more detailed enquiries when there are grounds for concern. That calls for judgement about the actual arrangement; a scheduled review does not excuse overlooking relevant information received between reviews.
In Scotland, the Scottish Government’s waste producer guidance advises rechecking transporter registrations from time to time. It also explains that the amount of checking depends on the quantity or nature of the waste. Use the Scottish guidance for Scottish activities, including the relevant authorisation terminology.
Avoid putting a sentence such as “the law requires an annual supplier check” into a procedure unless a specific requirement really applies to that activity. A customer contract or certification scheme might impose its own review frequency. Record that separately so colleagues understand where the deadline came from.
When should the first waste supplier check happen?
Complete the checks needed for the proposed service before waste is handed over. Start early enough to resolve questions about the collecting business and receiving facility. If a quotation arrives on Friday for a Monday clearance, allow time for enquiries rather than making the collection date your approval deadline.
Build the first review around an identifiable arrangement. Record the producing premises, waste stream, collecting carrier and intended destination. Where a broker arranges the service, identify its role as well. The supplier’s trading name by itself rarely tells a reviewer which activities were considered.
Keep a practical note of what was agreed. A supplier might be suitable for collecting segregated packaging from one premises while a separate enquiry is needed for contaminated materials at another. State the scope of the decision so a future colleague can see whether a proposed collection fits it.
Use how to check a waste supplier when setting up the original review. Ongoing monitoring can then compare the service actually being provided with that starting record, instead of repeatedly reconstructing it from old emails.
How can you choose a sensible review frequency?
Begin with the questions that could change your decision to use the arrangement. A business producing a small, predictable office waste stream may have fewer moving parts than a construction project using several carriers and changing receiving sites. The timetable should reflect those differences.
Consider how much waste is involved, whether its composition varies and how difficult it is to manage. Also consider the number of destinations, subcontracting arrangements and outstanding enquiries. An unresolved question should have its own action date; it should not disappear into the next general review.
Ask how quickly your team would learn about a change. A site manager who regularly speaks with the collecting contractor has a different information route from a head office managing services through an intermediary. Where updates travel slowly, improve communication as well as considering a closer review interval.
Write down your reason for the chosen interval in a sentence. For example: “We will review this route every quarter while the project changes its waste streams and destinations.” That explanation helps the next reviewer decide whether the timetable still fits when the project settles down.
What might a practical supplier review schedule look like?
The following is an example of an internal management approach, not a statutory timetable. Adapt it to your waste, locations and information needs. It assumes there is already a satisfactory initial review and a way for site staff to report changes between scheduled checks.
| Review occasion | Suggested internal task |
|---|---|
| Before the first collection | Confirm the proposed parties, waste and destination and resolve the checks needed for that arrangement. |
| During routine collections | Notice differences in the collecting business, paperwork, waste or stated route and pass concerns to the review owner. |
| At a chosen periodic review | Recheck relevant official records and compare the current service with the approved arrangement. |
| Before a recorded renewal deadline | Confirm the applicable requirement and obtain current evidence in time to decide about forthcoming collections. |
| Before agreeing a material service change | Assess the change and update the decision for the affected arrangement. |
| Before contract renewal | Review unresolved matters and confirm the scope of the service being renewed. |
Some businesses may choose an annual full review with targeted checks at shorter intervals for particular routes. Others may need much closer attention during a changing project. The example is useful only if it leaves room to respond to what happens between diary dates.
Choose dates that someone can actually meet. Assign a deputy and allow time for the supplier or regulator to answer an enquiry. Setting every review for the final working day before Christmas can leave a well-designed spreadsheet with nobody available to resolve the results.
Put the agreed timetable into a waste supplier monitoring policy. If several reviews compete for attention, use our guide to prioritising supplier reviews to organise the work.
Should you check a carrier registration at every collection?
There is no universal instruction here to repeat an identical online search for every unchanged routine collection. Your checking arrangements must still support transfer to an appropriately authorised person. If a different collecting business appears, or you receive information that casts doubt on registration, an old check needs reconsideration.
Site staff can help without becoming register specialists. Give them the agreed collecting business details and an escalation contact. Ask them to report an unexpected business name, a proposed diversion or paperwork that does not fit the collection. Explain who will decide whether the issue is resolved before handover.
The collector might use a different vehicle or driver while the authorised business remains the same. Establish what has actually changed. A different company taking over the collection needs a different enquiry from a familiar contractor sending another driver.
Our guide to what to do when a different waste collector arrives covers that handover decision. Record the outcome against the affected collection so the next shift does not have to ask the same question without access to the answer.
Are registration renewals the same as supplier review dates?
A renewal deadline belongs to a particular authorisation or registration. A supplier review date belongs to your management process. Keep separate fields for both. A current registration can still relate to a service whose destination has changed, and a satisfactory review cannot extend an expired authorisation.
In England, GOV.UK’s carrier registration guidance distinguishes upper-tier renewal from lower-tier registration, which does not need renewal. Do not assign the same expiry rule to every entry. For activities elsewhere, check the relevant regulator’s current requirements and the actual record.
Where you have a stated expiry date, set an earlier internal reminder that allows time for enquiries. If a supplier says it has applied to renew, establish the status and any applicable rules before deciding whether a forthcoming collection can proceed. A promise to send a certificate later does not answer the authorisation question.
Use expired waste carrier registration for that specific problem. For exemptions, keep the registered activity and applicable conditions in view alongside renewal dates; waste exemption expiry and renewal explains the separate checks.
For the reminder process itself, read how to track carrier and exemption renewal dates.
What changes should bring a supplier review forward?
Useful triggers include a new receiving facility, a change of operator, a different collecting business or a new waste stream. A permit document or regulator notice may also change what you understand about the intended route. Review the part of the arrangement affected by the information.
Operational observations count as information too. A contractor who repeatedly cannot explain the destination, or paperwork naming a facility different from the agreed one, creates a question that an unchanged register result will not settle. Ask for the relevant explanation and supporting evidence.
Company changes need interpretation. A registered office update may simply require a record correction. A different legal entity invoicing for the service may require investigation of who is contracting, collecting or operating the receiving site. Avoid treating every company filing as equally significant.
Keep a short trigger list beside your review calendar. Link each trigger to an owner and a way to report it. The waste supplier review triggers guide gives more examples, including changes originating within your own business.
How do you distinguish a new event from an old record?
Record when the event happened, when the source published it and when your business found it, where those dates are available. A notice discovered this morning may describe an earlier period. An old event may still matter, but the review should explain its timing accurately.
For a changed permit, find the relevant document and effective date. Compare it with the document used for your previous decision. A filename or page timestamp alone may not tell you which conditions apply to the next collection.
If a document is unavailable, record the gap and seek clarification. SEPA’s register help explains limitations affecting its search service and document availability. An unsuccessful search needs investigation before you conclude that an authorisation has ceased or never existed.
An alert can give the reviewer a starting point, but someone still needs to establish the affected entity and practical consequence. Follow how to investigate a waste supplier alert when the result is ambiguous or potentially affects an imminent collection.
How should a business handle an overdue supplier review?
Find out what has been missed. An internal review that is three days overdue is a different issue from a registration whose authorisation status cannot be established. Check for unresolved concerns, upcoming collections and known changes before deciding what action is needed.
Assign a person to complete the overdue work and set a realistic action date. If the information needed to assess a particular route is missing, escalate that route to the person authorised to decide about collections. Do not extend the due date repeatedly while leaving the underlying question unanswered.
Where several reviews are overdue, prioritise those involving relevant changes or uncertain arrangements. Record the reason for the order so colleagues understand why one review was addressed first. A simple list of deadlines can hide the difference between administrative delay and a question about lawful handling.
For England and Wales, section 3.2 of the duty of care code says you must withhold waste if you suspect the receiving person lacks the appropriate permit or exemption, or is breaching its conditions. Report suspected illegal activity or breaches to the relevant regulator. A future review appointment cannot resolve that immediate concern.
Afterwards, check why the review was missed. The owner may have left, the reminder may have gone to an unused inbox or too many suppliers may have been assigned the same date. Correct that practical cause while keeping the outcome of the individual review available.
What does a supplier review look like in practice?
Consider a hypothetical retailer whose cardboard is collected weekly. Its original review identifies the carrier and receiving facility. The retailer chooses an annual full review as its own policy and asks the store manager to report changes between reviews.
Six weeks later, the contractor proposes another destination while the usual site undergoes maintenance. The retailer reviews the proposed facility before agreeing the diversion. It checks the operator and relevant authorisation against the waste and activity, asks when the alternative route will start and records which stores are affected.
The annual diary date remains useful for a wider review. The diversion has its own decision and follow-up date, including confirmation of whether the original destination resumes. The review owner updates the store instructions so a temporary route does not become permanent merely because nobody revisits it.
For a business with several branches, the relevant information should reach every affected manager. Managing waste suppliers across multiple sites explains how to share checks while retaining the details that differ between locations.
What evidence should you keep after rechecking a supplier?
Keep enough information to explain what you checked, the source and date, and the decision for the specified arrangement. Include outstanding questions and their owners. Retain earlier evidence where it explains how the decision changed, subject to your appropriate retention arrangements.
Supplier review notes and legally required movement records have different purposes. Section 3.4 of the England and Wales code advises recording checks as evidence of meeting your duty of care. Required transfer and consignment records have their own retention rules, so keep those requirements separately identified in your procedure.
Make the review file accessible to the deputy as well as the usual owner. If a supplier sends a revised document to an individual inbox, attach it to the relevant arrangement before closing the task. Otherwise, colleagues may continue using the previous version while the current evidence sits with someone on leave.
Use recording supplier review evidence to organise the checks and waste record retention periods for the separate document requirements. Label a recommended business retention policy clearly so it is not mistaken for a statutory minimum.